|
Comparison of Expected Versus Actual Performance
of HVAC Systems in a Laboratory Building
Theodore Mowinski, II, PE, Newcomb
& Boyd
One of the most difficult challenges of architects and engineers
during the design phase is estimating the energy consumption of
variable volume lab buildings. This is, in part, due to several
factors, including highly variable equipment loads and actual fume
hood usage. The presentation will review a recently completed LEED
certified 130,000 sq ft research lab/animal holding facility. Specifically,
the presentation will review the project with respect to the Labs21
Approach and the HVAC energy conservation features it employs. This
includes energy recovery units using energy recovery wheels, condensate
recovery, and other innovative lab specific energy conservation
features to reduce total supply air. The major focus of the presentation
will be a review of the anticipated energy conservation/usage expected
versus the actual data that has been gathered since the building
has been completed. In addition, the presentation will highlight
expected versus actual lab equipment load densities, chiller performance,
heating hot water performance, energy wheel performance, and condensate
recovery system performance.
The goal of the presentation will be for attendees to walk away
with a basis of actual building energy usage that could be applied
as a guide to assist in future energy estimation for laboratory
buildings.
Labs21 Connection:
The presentation will note the innovative design strategies that
reflect the Labs21 Approach and track the performance of those technologies.
Again, a strong focus of the actual building performance versus
the design will be emphasized.
Energy and Environmental Performance goals: The project sets both
energy performance and water conservation goals based on LEED
criteria. The presentation will evaluate how well those goals have
been achieved and will also evaluate the performance based on the
recently published Labs21 Environmental Performance Criteria, Version
2.1 (January 3, 2005). While this document was not available during
the design of this project, it will be interesting to compare and
contrast the LEED checklist with the Labs21 checklist.
Sustainable Energy and Water Efficiency Strategies: The design
incorporated chillers with variable frequency drives and variable
volume primary chilled water pumping. Energy recovery wheels were
provided on the air handling units serving laboratory spaces. Condensate
recovery from air handling units was used for cooling tower water
make-up. An innovative general exhaust strategy to reduce the cooling
load for equipment space was employed. The actual performance of
these systems versus the anticipated design will be highlighted
in the presentation.
Measure Energy and Water Consumption: The project is part of a
large university campus with a high standard for monitoring energy
and water consumption. The DDC system was, therefore, designed to
both monitor and track the usage of these utilities. The presentation
will incorporate efforts with the DDC manufacturer to highlight
the advantages and challenges faced during the design and the success
the campus has had using the information generated by the DDC system.
Biography:
Todd Mowinski earned his Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering
from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1997. During his eight
years with Newcomb & Boyd, he has developed a particular expertise
in the design of mechanical systems for laboratory, research, and
healthcare facilities. Mr. Mowinski's experience includes laboratory
projects for numerous universities across the country, including
Emory University, Tulane University, and the University of North
Carolina. His work totals more than one million square feet and
over $250 million in construction value. Along with design, Mr.
Mowinski heads up the weekly meeting for HVAC engineers at Newcomb
& Boyd, keeping them up-to-date on codes, applications, and
the newest trends. In addition, he was recently published in Animal
Lab News.
Back to the Agenda
|